A generative-urbanism study of the Zaragoza community in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico — where instead of drawing a master plan, the “designer” writes the scoring rules and lets a genetic solver evolve the block-by-block program layout.

Revitalization as a generative, rule-based problem — rather than propose a fixed redevelopment plan, this project maps the vacancy, recovers its material, and lets an algorithm decide what to build where. The Zaragoza community sits among the large informal residential areas of Ciudad Juarez, where up to 60% of dwellings are uninhabited — the result of a high crime rate and emigration driven by neighborhood instability.
The move begins by selectively demolishing empty settlements and sorting the demolition material into the local steel-recycling economy that is already prominent at the border. The emptied parcels then become a search space. Each parcel is scored on measurable qualities — size (roughly 200 to 1,000+ m²), street access, within- and between-block relationships, surrounding demographics, and how many existing programs it reaches within a five-minute walk. That quantitative site analysis becomes the database against which new public programs are placed.
Approach
The workflow runs across three phases — Urban Contextual Analysis → Site Quantitative Analysis → Program Layout Proposal:
- Identify & recover — GIS mapping of abandoned housing; demolished parcels feed the border scrap economy rather than landfill
- Score every parcel — a Grasshopper definition evaluates parcel size, street access, inter-block relationships, and 5-minute-walk accessibility to existing programs and population
- Assign program rules — each candidate program (Sports Court, Green Spaces, Tianguis street market, Shops & Supermarkets, New Housing) carries its own placement preferences for footprint, street access, block composition, and proximity to density
- Evolve the layout — the Galapagos genetic solver runs a multi-criteria fitness score over the whole community, converging over ~10,000 iterations from a nominal score near 63 toward 100
Boards

Outcomes
- Urban form is evolved, not authored — the deliverable is a scoring system plus a solver, not a single fixed plan
- The iteration matrix makes the tradeoffs legible: 36 layouts spanning nominal scores from ~63 to 100, balancing program mix, accessibility, and demographics
- Reframes border revitalization as a data-driven, generative problem and closes the loop with a qualitative evaluation-and-adjustment step over the solver’s output
Links
Related cards
- [[2021-2024-Rice—fiber-based-pavilion]] — parallel Rice parametric research (published at IASS 2024)
- [[2021-2024-Rice—membrane-form-finding]] — Rice parametric studio work